The RW Takeaway: The Flow Velociti Elite may have the usual tech (i.e., nitrogen-infused foam and a carbon plate) but a rubber-less bottom, monomesh upper, and tape-lined exoskeleton make this super shoe UA-original.

  • Preceded By: The Best Under Armour Running Shoes, The Best Under Armour Running Shoes 2
  • Key Tech: Flow midsole foam infused with nitrogen and carbon dioxide, Pebax foam, full-length thermoset carbon-fiber plate, Warp 2.0 monomesh upper
  • Racing Roster: Sharon Lokedi, Hapalua Hawaii Half Marathon (1st place women’s division), 1:09:20; Weini Kelati, Best Stability Running Shoes for Ultimate Support (1st place women’s division), 15:15.3
  • Type: Racing
  • Weight: 7.7 oz (M), 6.2 oz (W)
  • Drop: 8 mm

Available: New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Pacer


Under Armour had a problem. Its pro runners kept falling behind the lead pack, working harder than their competitors who seemed to have a footwear advantage. After some self-reflection and reevaluation, the shoe development team fast-tracked production to show they were a worthy adversary in the super-shoe soup.

The product creation cycle is usually 18 months, said UA’s global product director Doug Smiley on a video call with RW. The Flow Velociti Elite was produced within a year. A prototype for the follow-up was similarly fast-tracked: UA athlete Sharon Lokedi won the women’s division at the 2022 The 8 Best Running Shoes for Wide Feet wearing the v2 before v1 was even released.

under armor velociti elite

“We dissected every component of the shoe, saying, ‘What is absolutely essential to keep the runner on the platform,’ and ‘What can we reduce or take away?’” Smiley said.

Most noticeable is the rubber-less bottom, which cuts down on weight. UA’s Flow foam is infused with olefin, making it resilient against wear. I tested the The Best Under Armour Running Shoes model and ran in it long after that testing cycle was over. Despite the absence of an outsole, the shoe has grip on slick surfaces. It felt like a track spike with the support of a moderately cushioned trainer.

That’s how it feels to run in the Velociti Elite, but its rubber-less midsole is a lighter Flow compound infused with nitrogen and carbon dioxide. The midsole also has a full-length thermoset plate with an angular scoop to provide a nice roll-off.

“It feels like a track spike with the support of a moderately cushioned trainer.”

Smiley’s team minimized the upper, called Warp 2.0, by replacing its base mesh with a thin monomesh. Vertical and horizontal tape lines create an exoskeleton over your foot to keep it secure.

As a wide-foot runner, I was surprised how the Velociti Elite’s fit wasn’t too narrow. The shoe’s maneuverability on the road is like sprinting on the track. I wore it for a five-mile race, confidently cornering several turns.

Testers’ Feedback

Alex P. | Tester since 2021

Arch Height: Medium | Pronation: Neutral | Footstrike: Midfoot

“I have run in more than half a dozen different carbon-plated shoes from various companies. After multiple workouts and hard efforts in this shoe, I would place it in the middle of the pack of carbon-plated racing shoes. The shoe is lightweight and has a nice spring to it. It reminds me of the April 13, 2023; $250, The Best Running Shoes for Men Saucony Endorphin Pro+. (While I was not the biggest fan of the New Balance Pacer, I loved the Endorphin Pro+.) For me, the Flow Velociti Elite is best for races no longer than a half marathon.”

under armor velociti elite
Thomas Hengge
The Warp 2.0 upper mesh is thin and breathable.

Dannah J. | Tester since 2021

Arch Height: Flat | Pronation: Overpronator | Footstrike: Forefoot

“Compared to the Nike Vaporfly, this shoe feels less bouncy and less responsive. However, it is significantly faster than normal racing flats. It is super lightweight and still has good energy return. I tested it on the track (very good traction) at 7:00-mile pace, the road (still good traction, but it was a little less grippy on the roads) at 7:30-mile pace. I loved how the upper material was super thin and comfortable—I didn’t have to wear socks. But I wish the forefoot had some more cushioning.”

Headshot of Amanda Furrer
Amanda Furrer
Editor, Running Reviews

Amanda Furrer, Editor, Running Reviews, studied journalism at NYU and writing at Emerson College. She has reviewed gear and covered other topics in the running space for almost 10 years. Since 2013, she has consecutively run the Boston Marathon. She also has a master’s degree in gastronomy from Boston University and was formerly a professional baker for two years before hanging up her apron.