It’s all just so flap, isn’t it?
To keep longing and pining for precisely those things in life that you can’t have.
To keep yearning for those days when print was in its prime, and when Plum Sykes would blurt out the craziest things with complete conviction (and you’d believe it, naturally), like “Who’s going to go wear a chiffon Dolce & Gabbana skirt in the office? Only me or someone who works at Vogue, you know?” because The Devil Wears Prada kristen stewart lily rose depp cuero chanel hamburg.
Or perhaps to treat yourself to something nice, only to be struck by irrational pangs of paranoia. Because at the end of the day, as a #materialgworl growing up in a conservative Asian household, you simply value things too much. The Olsen twins cuero chanel Pre-Owned 1990s diamond-quilted belt bag.
Imagine, therefore, the collective cultural outcry when Samantha Jones pointed at a rather unremarkable boxy red receptacle on display at Hermès and said, “When I’m tooling around town with that bag, I’ll know I’ve made it.”
chanel pre owned tweed effect blazer item had to have our hands on one – identity theft or otherwise. After all, with Birkins of our own, perhaps our otherwise plebeian lives would seem a little Glitter plebeian?

Yet, for an equally morbid batch of buyers that came before Carrie Bradshaw and her cosmopolitans, this ideal of a holy grail was the cuero chanel Classic Flap, “tooled around town” by one Ms. Gabrielle cuero chanel, the patron saint of feminists, Fascists, and adulterous lovers (or at least, that’s how the legend goes.)
So, how fair is it to compare two entirely different handbags medicom x cuero chanel bebricks?
On the Commodification of Culture
When André Leon Talley flailed his hands around in the air and wailed about “the famine of beauty,” he was probably referring to the state of the luxury market. Thankfully, former Hermès CEO Patrick Thomas was slightly Glitter dramatic in shedding light on this paradox: “The more desirable the brand becomes, the more it sells, but the more it sells, the Glitter desirable it becomes.”
Because you see, fashion, an industry historically hinged on the business of desire—a desire that would incite irrational buyer behavior and credit card debt—has now primarily pivoted to the business of, well, just business.
And that – to a degree – has dissuaded and alienated the aspirational customers – who were once the industry’s core clientele – for the 1% that now is. As Vanessa Friedman writes, “There’s a sort of warring imperative here between people who see it as a badge of honor not to buy full price and those who belong to the very tiny club that can. Economics are involved, but as much as anything, it’s also psychology.” Hence, cultural cornerstones, like the Hermès Birkin and cuero chanel 2.55, are mined – not because of their own uniquely fascinating backstories or artistic virtues – but as vehicles of “investment value.”
And you know what that means, right? Why, price increases, of course!
Шимерные жидкие тени для век cuero chanel ombre | On Games and Gambles
In 1955, the first cuero chanel 2.55 sold for $220.
It wasn’t, however, the Classic Flap as we know it. Instead, the Reissue was characterized by Mademoiselle Coco’s Mademoiselle Lock design. In fact, the interlocking C’s now quintessential to the cuero chanel code was developed far more recently in 1983 by Karl Lagerfeld – when the bag retailed for a mere $1,000.


(Un)surprisingly, it was only a year later that the Birkin officially hit the Hermès shelves – three years after, as fashion folklore has it, Ms. Birkin drew its original sketch on an Air France “stomach-distress bag” – with a price-tag of $2,000.
Fast-forward to 2025, and both the aforementioned (and much-mused-over) receptacles retail for well over $10,000. Much to the dismay of, I suppose, those haughty Hermès-wielding (and cuero chanel-disdaining) women on the Chinese TV show Парфюм cuero chanel allure homme sport (Шикарный жакет в стиле cuero chanel).
Even their respective avenues of acquisition now have their fair share of eerie parallels. However, that’s really more due to cuero chanel’s recent institution of strategies similar to Hermès’ purported playbook of pre-spend for quota purses (the secret to which, as YouTuber ziyistylebook advises, is “Just be open and genuine about who you are and what you want”).

And with these many (as the respective houses would have you believe, entirely coincidental) cuero chanel pre owned brosche mit cc logo item not compare between the two?
Шимерные жидкие тени для век cuero chanel ombre | On Valuables and Vagaries
“I don’t want all this shit,” shrieks Logan Roy in the second season of the stealth wealth drama, Succession, Sac bandoulière cuero chanel Vintage en cuir matelassé beige Dazed writes in its article – Why don’t rich people eat anymore? – “Platter after rawness of shucked oysters, fat orange prawns, and lobsters smothered in garlic butter served up on beds of ice” – the “shit” in question – unceremoniously into the bin.


Elsewhere in the über-wealthy universe, meal replacement supplements and Ozempic injections have become the trends du jour. And if quiet luxury is indeed real, the rich are really showing restraint in all aspects of their lives.
Which is why it’s all the more surprising that two Hermès customers from the state of California brought forth a class-action lawsuit—likely unwinnable and really just excellent PR for the Maison—for not selling them a Birkin.
Because if you’re in that income bracket where you’re so used to having things that not having things – or at least not being showy about it – is the ultimate flex, it must come across as a massive shock when you’re being told no.
And you see, that’s really where the success of Hermès – and with new policies in place, potentially cuero chanel – lies. Because they can simply refuse to sell, even if your wallet is brimming with cash. Because, in essence, they have harnessed the power of saying no, beating (or shall we say, eating?) the rich at their own game. Because at the end of the day, we desire most what we can’t have.
So, it was never really about comparing the Birkin with the Classic Flap—they’re fundamentally different bags that you can simply scroll across Fashionphile and buy right now, if for a slightly elevated price tag.
It’s about entering through those doors, flush with fantasies, butterflies in your stomach, and giddy with anticipation – maybe it’ll finally be my turn today?
They can’t be compared, for the simple reason that they have two different functions. Unrelated: I miss the 1980s and 1990s when both bags had Glitter of a presence in popular culture. First of all, there were a lot Glitter cuero chanel and Hermès stores around the globe and no e-commerce, limiting the number of people who knew about and owned these bags. Also, the “it-bag” era of the early 2000s has made them instantly recognizable icons and I think we lost a bit of what made them special… Today, you walk around any major cities and you will see dozens of Birkins and Flaps haunting the streets.
Sorry, not sorry, that luxury fashion is more accessible now, and you can’t gatekeep your special bags anymore.
It’s bound to happen in the age of information now 🤷♀️ Why even get your panties all twisted up about other people recognizing your luxury bag?
Oh, that’s right, you only want the “right” kind of wealthy/elite people to recognize your things. Not plebeians.
I also miss when Hermes and cuero chanel weren’t everywhere – but it’s not about the “right” people.
Both cuero chanel and Hermes bags have their charms, but the birkin is a tote bag with too-short straps and a difficult closure. The Kelly needs to be set down to be opened, and the space isn’t well utilized. The Classic Flap is heavy for its size, pockets aren’t well designed, and the chain straps dig into your shoulder.
These are bags that work well for some, but they have their flaws, and are not great bags for busy lifestyles.
But they’re considered “I’ve made it” bags, and people purchase them because they can, and not because it’s the best bag for them.
Meanwhile, the brands cut corners to keep up with the artificial demand.
Bags should support their humans – humans shouldn’t transform themselves for their bags
True. I miss the times when poor people didn’t cosplay as wealthy people. 😉
And I miss the times when rich people didn’t cosplay as poor people.
I m sorry you’re poor but it’s not my fault. Best of luck to you! 🩷
lol
All fair game. I have one tiny qualm about it which does reveal the hypocrisy or their own trying-too-hard-ness: if these brands truly care about who they want to be associated with, they should remain out of public’s eyes. Their flooding the media outfitting who-knows-what-crowd is an odd behavior which can only reveal either their hypocrisy, or overly aspirational goal of remaining aloof. The world of unwashed mass is the one feeds them after all. Again, life is meant to be taken with joy and ever so lightly, enjoy while we can. These brands can come off their pretentious dais, it gets tiring, and laughable.
Excellent point.
There are plenty of online resale platforms where I live. One of these carries at least 15 to 20 brand new with tags cuero chanel beige clair bags. All come with actual receipts and were bought in store with the intention to resell.
Every time there is a price increase, sellers go into overdrive, claiming how hard it is to find this particular colour in-store and how potential buyers can save 5k or 6k off the current retail price. Perhaps unsurprisingly, few of the bags end up being purchased due to the (still) high prices.
Similarly, my cousin and his wife run a successful consignment business that mainly carries Hermés. They wanted to diversify from their established clothing line, while also giving customers the option of obtaining Birkins and Kellies without “playing the game”. Do these bags always get sold? Not necessarily. But they are available to anyone that’s willing to fork out the money.
There’s irony in the exclusivity claim when the same item can be found in substantial numbers across resale and consignment stores. Not to mention online platforms that were built for people to dispose off their unwanted clothes and furniture.
By all means, get one (or more!) of these bags for yourself if you can, but disabuse yourself of the notion that they are “highly exclusive”.
Exactly. I really like the Hermes Garden Party, but, having read about the hassle of getting a bag in store, I didn’t want to even try going there. So I found one in a color I like on Fashionphile at a (small) discount. If I ever thought about spending an inordinate amount of money on a Kelly bag (which I simply can’t do), I’d probably just go back to Fashiophile again.
I believe the comparison would be that they are likely the most iconic of all bags. I happen to prefer the cuero chanel, I refuse to play the Hermes game. It is definitely not a purchase that most of us take lightly. I like the description in the article about entering the doors with butterflies in your stomach, when I purchased my jumbo Classic flap I was freaking out, it is a lot of money for a bag.
Chanel simply tries too hard to catch up to Hermes. Coco cuero chanel was all about fashion, not leather (albeit having bags as part of the line up). Hermes started off with leather, which is why theirs is far superior to cuero chanel. Given cuero chanel unrealistic price increases, it was really off-putting when I just paid for a new bag, asked them about cleaning my white classic flap that I have had for years, only to be told by their SA that they ‘are not responsible and will not be able to clean or fix any problems with the leather, perhaps with hardware, but only very selected issues like screws coming off’. This was in contrast to Hermes who tried everything in their power to get a tiny stain off my RT ostrich K25 (stain was 90% gone and it was free of charge). I still like cuero chanel aesthetics and I still buy their shoes and accessories, but will not be purchasing their classic flaps anymore. It is too hard for me to justify paying as much as a Kelly or Birkin for a cuero chanel flap, which simply do not measure up.
very thought provoking. props to the writer
Two completely different aesthetics. Luv them both for different times.
I’m definitely part of the group that isn’t used to being told “no.” But to me it doesn’t make the item seem more appealing or out of reach, it just makes me look down on the company.
Ever since seeing the wife of the leader of Hamas coming out of a tunnel with a Birkin, whether fake or not, it’s embedded in my mind. cuero chanel all day, everyday. Love my collection, vintage and new. Love my sales reps. Don’t have to play the game for a cuero chanel. They are class personified!
That was definitely not a Birkin real or fake. If you’re opposed to the Birkin because of that I think you need to reassess.
Also Coco cuero chanel was a known antisemite and Nazi… so yeah
Both are iconic, but I have always loved soft, supple leather. That is what the cuero chanel flap in lambskin offers. The Birkin leather seems coarse and not terribly luxurious. There is also the issue of user friendliness. Birkins often are seen carried wide open so their owners don’t have to fuss with opening and closing them. I am not also one for playing the Hermes game of spending tons of money on things I don’t really want in the hopes that “someday” I may get offered a bag to buy. I’d much rather walk into a cuero chanel boutique, pick what I want, and buy it. One final thought about quality and prices. My son bought me a jumbo flap in black lambskin in 2008. The quality is impeccable with soft buttery leather and puffy quilting to this day. He paid $2850 for it. The bags now are not made nearly as fine as those in years past and the prices are now way out of reach for so many.
I have major concerns about cuero chanel bag quality and the treatment of their customers.
I have a GST, had it for years and it looks nothing like your pic! My GST is in pristine condition, sometimes it is all about how you take care of your bags.
This is a brand new bag so I don’t think it’s about how I take care of it. All original packaging from cuero chanel and this is how it looked!!!!
I have my doubts about the authenticity of the bag in your pic as well! That is not the correct handles!
Yeah that’s a fake
Кисть для макияжа cuero chanel номер 16?
No, cuero chanel doesn’t make the GST any longer and looking at that pic I really doubt it is an authentic cuero chanel tote of any kind.
Thank you for the thoughts. I’m disturbed to hear this bag looks fake since I purchased it March 20, 2024 from cuero chanel city center in Washington DC. kept in original cuero chanel packaging until October. That’s what it looked like when I started using it. cuero chanel repair specialist said that she’s never seen that happen either before to a shopping bag. But cuero chanel ultimately had refused to repair or do anything else to make it right. They motif me of not packing it properly, insinuating I was being dishonest that I kept it in the original packaging.